Hi there!
I am currently working on my tesla coil which
is almost done. I am using the OneTesla TC design as a reference for my
DRSSTC with primary feedback. The last thing which is missing are IGBTs.
If you look at the OneTesla design, you will observe high frequency
pulses going to the primary (feel free to see [http://onetesla.com/).](http://onetesla.com/) The primary frequency (chosen
with primary capacitor and coil itself) matches the secondary resonance
frequency. This already creates problem, because it is around 230kHz.
This can cause problems later, because of the 340V bus and up to 300A
pulses. This forces us to use IGBT, which usually can switch as fast as
200kHz maximum. There are specified IGBTs for this job, but I not
interested into ISOTOP package IGBTs (or similar high power IGBT and
expensive things) anyways. There is very experienced IGBT, the
FGH60N60SMD out there, which seems to perform just fine up to 300kHz and
can handle presented voltages and current. And that is actually, where
the problem starts. There are so many variations of 60N60 IGBT out
there, please help me. [IXGH60N60C3D1](https://www.tme.eu/sk/details/ixgh60n60c3d1/tranzistory-igbt-tht/ixys/) [IGW60N60H3](https://www.tme.eu/sk/details/igw60n60h3/tranzistory-igbt-tht/infineon-technologies/) [FGA60N65SMD](https://www.tme.eu/sk/details/fga60n65smd/tranzistory-igbt-tht/on-semiconductor-fairchild/) [FGH60N60SMD](https://www.tme.eu/sk/details/fgh60n60smd/tranzistory-igbt-tht/on-semiconductor-fairchild/) The price really matters for me. If not, I would just
simply pick the FGH version. My question thow is, if there is a difference
between those, maybe, if there is better version of 60N60 IGBT than FGH (like
IXN...). If there is not difference, does it mean that I just pick the
cheapest one and it will work like a charm? Alse, if there is not better
IGBT version of 60N60, I will take the FGH60N60SMD and we will be settled.
Let me know your experience. Thanks
Firefox
52.0
Windows
10
EasyEDA
5.9.41