- This is regarding easyEDA lib now, the elements of “Widgets” were different … (it seems some of the issues weren’t there) Comparing AA off and on in Safari and FF: **a) Text:** I think in both versions the element’s text (Arial 7) is nearly perfect in sharpness and readability, but it always has the AA set to “on”. When I compare the AA in easyEDA to e.g. Wikipedia on the same font style and size the latter is slightly better. - **Safari:** There is a problem when the zoom is below 100% because the text size remains constant and the text (lines) run into each other (FF is OK). http://screencast.com/t/GZI7y6CB1Hkq **b) Electronic elements, AA off:** 50%: Only for overview. In Safari unusable (text). 75%: All lines are sharp, but suddenly lines are 2 pix wide. However, it’s visible and usable (just the text is bad, see above). 100%: All lines are sharp to the dot, the vertical ones are 1 pix misaligned to the right from the grid. Some parts have visible **artifacts**, e.g. the diode (top corner) or the power supplies (e.g. VCVS), which is ugly. Circles and diagonal lines are somewhat zig zag, but OK. 150%: All lines are sharp. No artifacts, but some horizontal lines are 1 pix wider (case of CVS). Circles and some diagonal lines (BJT) are ugly. 200%: Better, hmmm. Not top. **c) Electronic elements with AA on:** 50%: Blurred, only for overview. In Safari unusable (text). 75%: Blurred, but it’s visible and usable (just the text is bad in Safari, see above). Some vertical lines are sharp. 100%: Blurred, hurts the eye after some time. No artifacts, however. 150%: Much better, slightly blurred, but absolutely no problem. 200%: That’s OK now, because of the bold lines you can’t hardly see the blurred circles / diagonal lines. --> So again, basically, why is the easyEDA graphics worse than e.g. CircuitLab? Or is it the red color of the elements? It seems black is better for AA ... - OK, what about making the 150 to 100% (the default) with AA set to on? This could be a workaround until there is a better solution ???