I have a question related to the **design** **priority level** (or overrding criteria)  for set route width and clearance values in both \- Autorouter table criterias and \- Design Rule table criterias Which table has more priority in the auto router run phase to end result or which table criteria is run first  ? If I let the auto router run very long time does it also try to move the components "slightly" or are the given positions fixed  ? I ask that because I saw a miracle over night and the locally installed  auto router had find a routing solution and all tracks fit to the pcb design. Is there a simple statement how  the width and clearance values should be put to both tables in relation to each other ? Any opportunities in the design roadmap to have the  current gerber viewer in cloud also being a local linux application like the auto router ?