Hi thank you for your report. Yes, we are improving this now, and it will upgrade to the major version, will need some time. 1)we won't provide the mixed case for the titles in the future because the mixed case is difficult for data processing. so at few previous version, we decide the PCB lib title only support upper case. 2)clone is the difference with the save/save as. they shouldn't be same. 3)when you save or clone the footprint, you can find it at your person libraries, and click it , click the edit button, or right click on it, you can change its tags,title,descripton. https://easyeda.com/Doc/Tutorial/PCBLib.htm#Edit-PCBLibs thanks

My response: 1) But you do allow mixed cases. When using the Save scenario, only upper case is allow. When using the Clone scenario, mixed case is allowed. It is not consistent. 2) But they both do the same thing. They both copy the current footprint into the personal library. Therefore, they should have the same dialog. 3) When you look at a footprint in the parts dialog, under the table, it has a title column and a package column. You can't edit the package name. This last point is where the greatest inconsistency lies. When you edit a footprint and then do Save/SaveAs, the name you give it is in all caps. This name is used for both the title and package. When using Clone, you give it a new title, but the package name is taken from the one you are cloning. The title can be mixed case, but not the package name. While you have the option to use mixed case when cloning, you can't when saving. Furthermore, you don't have the choice of a package name when cloning, but do when saving. You can't change the package name after the footprint is created. I realize this feature is complicated, thus the need to think everything through. It has taken me quite a while just to understand it enough to describe the problems. To summarize them: 1) The package name cannot be set during Cloning, but can when Saving. This is inconsistent and very confusing. It also cannot be changed, but I realize that may be an internal requirement since it must be upper case. 2) The package name does not appear to be used anywhere unless it is used for searching, in which case one ought to be able to change it. Because of these traits, the package name's presence is very confusing since it seems to serve no purpose. 3) The title and package name need to be separate fields in both the Clone and Save dialogs if the package name is needed for some reason. 4) The term 'package' itself is confusing. It seems to be a synonym for 'footprint'. Why is it separate from the footprint title? Again, there should be a compelling reason for keeping it, and it should be clear what its purpose is. 5) Again, the Clone and Save dialog should be the same. All fields should be present - title, package (if necessary), description and tags. Please pass on this discussion to the developers for consideration. Thanks.