EasyEDA does not currently support any way of splitting a net into more than a single route of continuous copper without generating an Incomplete Net warning. If you have a net on one part of a PCB that has the same name as a net on another part of the PCB but the two parts of the are not connected together by copper then you will get an Incomlete Net warning. As long as you understand the reason for that warning to occur and can be **absolutely** sure by manual inspection that the intended gap is the **only** cause of the warning, then you can ignore it. Otherwise you have no other choice but to give the nets different names. I would suggest adding an alphanumeric suffix. That is a much less error prone and therefore the recommended solution.

Note therefore that your schematic should show the separate nets and their associated header connections and so should be given differentiated net names anyway.

@andyfierman Thanks very much for the reply. > As long as you understand the reason for that warning to occur and can be **absolutely** sure by manual inspection that the intended gap is the only cause of the warning, then you can ignore it. I am sure, but I think I will use different names anyway, so that I can continue to use the automatic checks reliably. If I start ignoring specific warnings, there will be the time where I'll miss the "legit" one. > Note therefore that your schematic should show the separate nets and their associated header connections This is very inconvenient, but not a problem right now: I'm currently using EadyEDA to draw to PCB directly, I'm not using for schematics yet.

This explains why we recommend always starting with a Schematic: [https://easyeda\.com/forum/topic/The\_best\_way\_to\_design\_a\_PCB\_in\_EasyEDA\-ThR3pwqIC](https://easyeda.com/forum/topic/The_best_way_to_design_a_PCB_in_EasyEDA-ThR3pwqIC)<br> <br> :)