I was wondering if there is perhaps a chance to make the development of at least the Pro version somewhat more professional. You know, with a roadmap, regularly scheduled releases, reasonably reliable ETAs, a bug tracker, etc. Right now we are fully in the dark as to what and when to expect. Bug reports highlighting some serious deficiencies are dismissed with a reply about upcoming version 1.8, but it's been nearly three months since the last update and could be another three to go - there is no way to tell. I understand there is a language barrier to overcome, but if EasyEDA developers are serious about breaking into even the low-end of the professional market, there should be a concerted effort at improving the visibility, communication, issue tracking, and so on. User feedback should be discussed, not dismissed with "this is how things are now" (e.g. new copper area filler that misses some pad connections, or basically nonexistent versioning). Perhaps some additions to the team need to be made, perhaps priorities reallocated. Don't get me wrong - I really like the software. But there is work to be done and not all of it is coding. Just my $0.02.